tesla model x lou gehrig act jenny mccarthy toby mac blue ivy carter photos purple squirrel
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Is killing newborns really 'no different' than abortion? (The Week)
[unable to retrieve full-text content]The Week - A paper in an ethics journal argues that neither fetuses nor newborns are "actual persons" yet, so the same rules should apply to bothTwo ethicists from Australia's Melbourne University have inspired a fierce backlash by suggesting that killing newborn babies "should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is." The professors, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, argue in an article published in the British Journal of Medical Ethics that neither fetuses nor newborns have "the same moral status as actual persons" because they're not yet aware of their own existence — so "after-birth abortion" is "no different to abortion" during pregnancy. The authors have reportedly received a torrent of angry responses — even death threats — from appalled readers. Is there any legitimate reason to make such a shocking and provocative proposal?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.