Sunday, December 4, 2011

Art-theft suspect pleads not guilty in NYC (AP)

NEW YORK ? A wine steward suspected in a bicoastal art-theft spree lifted pricey art from New York hotels simply by walking out with the works in a canvas tote bag and then used them to line his own walls, prosecutors said Friday.

Mark Lugo, who just spent more than four months in jail for grabbing a $275,000 Picasso off a San Francisco art gallery wall, was being held without bail after pleading not guilty Friday to grand larceny and other charges in a Manhattan court.

"In an effort to display stolen art in his apartment, this repeat art thief boldly walked out of two Manhattan hotels in broad daylight" with valuable works, District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. said in a statement.

Lugo's New York lawyer, James Montgomery, said the 31-year-old was a "pleasant, engaging" man "who's been struggling with particular difficulties," which he wouldn't detail.

"When the dust settles, and the DA's office calms down a little bit, we'll find that Mr. Lugo is a man who had no commercial motive at all" in the alleged thefts, Montgomery said.

The charges relate to two thefts of a total of six artworks, including what prosecutors called a $350,000 sketch by the French Cubist painter Fernand Leger. But prosecutors said a search of Lugo's former apartment in Hoboken, N.J., turned up four other pieces ? including a Picasso work ? that may have been stolen from Manhattan venues, and they said the investigation was continuing.

Lugo was publicly identified as a suspect in several New York heists since shortly after his July arrest in San Francisco, where police identified him as the man who walked into the Weinstein Gallery, lifted the 1965 Picasso drawing "Tete de Femme" ("Head of a Woman") off the wall, strolled down the street with the sketch under his arm and hopped into a taxi. Police tracked Lugo to a friend's Napa County apartment, where the Picasso was found unframed and prepared for shipping.

At his Hoboken apartment, investigators then found a $430,000 trove of stolen art, carefully and prominently displayed, as well as high-priced wine, authorities said.

Among some 19 artworks at the apartment was Leger's 1917 "Composition with Mechanical Elements," Assistant District Attorney Meghan Hast told a judge. The drawing disappeared June 28 from an employee entrance area at a gallery in the Carlyle Hotel; prosecutors pegged its value at $350,000, though Montgomery said that figure warranted investigating.

Lugo also is charged with stealing a group of five works by the South Korea-born artist Mie Yim, known for her disconcerting images of toy bears and other toy-like creatures, from the Chambers Hotel on June 14. The hotel had bought the Yim works, together called "Pastel on Board," for $1,800 apiece, prosecutors said.

Representatives for the hotels didn't immediately return calls Friday.

The San Francisco district attorney's office has said Lugo also was suspected of several other New York art heists, including the theft of a $30,000 Picasso etching from the William Bennett Gallery on June 27.

The sometime sommelier and kitchen server at upscale Manhattan restaurants also is charged in New Jersey with taking $6,000 worth of wine - in the form of three bottles of Chateau Petrus Pomerol - in April from Gary's Wine and Marketplace in Wayne. He hasn't appeared in a New Jersey court yet to answer those charges.

Lugo pleaded guilty in October to grand theft for the San Francisco heist. He finished his 138-day sentence Nov. 21 but was being held until he could be transferred to New York.

Lugo's San Francisco attorney, Douglas Horngrad, has called him "more like someone who was in the midst of a psychiatric episode" than a calculating art thief.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/crime/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111202/ap_on_en_ot/us_purloined_picasso

ultimate fighter 14 ultimate fighter 14 rockefeller center how the grinch stole christmas bishop eddie long baylor art basel 2011

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Statewide donations create care packages for troops

'); if(infobox=='True' && ShowInfoBox_l650493_1==false){ jQuery("#player_infobarl650493_1").trigger('click'); ShowInfoBox_l650493_1==true; } }; $.setup_player(Play_Conf); //info bar setup jQuery('#player_infobarl650493_1').click(function() { var $info =jQuery('#player_info_contentl650493_1'); if($info.text()!=''){ var $content = jQuery('div',$info); //min heigth var min = $content.css('min-height'); var max = $content.css('max-height'); $info.slideToggle(600); ShowInfoBox_l650493_1=!ShowInfoBox_l650493_1; } }); });

? To view our videos, you need to
enable JavaScript. Learn how.
install Adobe Flash 9 or above. Install now.

Then come back here and refresh the page.

RALEIGH ? Donations from every county in North Carolina were used to create care packages for troops overseas.

During the State Employees' Credit Union's second annual campaign, the cooperative packed and shipped gift boxes to 5,000 N.C. National Guardsmen and soldiers.

"The love that we have for them, as much as you can put that in a box with items, we want them to feel the care that goes into putting these boxes together," said SECU Board of Directors Chairman McKinley Wooten.

Since September, community donations poured in to close to 240 SECU branches across the state.

"It's overwhelming. It has been everywhere in the building for about a month,? said SECU worker Kristy Arnold. ?It's taken them a really long time to separate and sort it, it's everywhere."

On Saturday, more than 130 SECU workers, their families and volunteers packed up the goods and greeting cards with well wishes. Lula Jones, 9, wrote a letter with a special message after helping to fill up boxes for the troops.

"I thanked them for doing all they can and I said good luck to them," said Jones.

SECU said the gift packages will be sent to 18 locations, mostly in Afghanistan.

Source: http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/650493/statewide-donations-create-care-packages-for-troops

kelly slater kelly slater palindrome palindrome asana als disease brittany norwood

Cutting deficits harder than just talking about it (AP)

WASHINGTON ? The coming year-end spending spree after so much debate over budget deficits shows just how hard it is to stem the government's flow of red ink.

Lawmakers are poised to spend $120 billion or so to renew a Social Security tax cut that averaged just under $1,000 per household this year. They're ready to commit up to $50 billion more to continue unemployment benefits to people out of work for more than half a year.

And doctors have no reason to doubt they won't be rescued, again, from steep cuts in their Medicare payments. Combine that with the tax cuts and jobless benefits, and Congress could add almost $200 billion to the federal ledger this month.

That's why it's excruciatingly difficult to cut the deficit, even when the House is dominated by tea party forces.

The year-end spree follows the failure of three high-profile efforts at big deficit deals: talks led by Vice President Joe Biden; efforts by President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, to strike a "grand bargain"; and the ignominious cratering of a special deficit supercommittee before Thanksgiving.

Each disintegrated in great measure over the question of taxes. But their failures also illustrate the tremendous difficulty in getting anyone to actually cut spending.

The singular success in attacking the deficit this year came after a protracted battle this summer over whether to let the government continue borrowing. That fight finally produced a promise of more than $2 trillion in cuts over the coming decade.

Even with those savings, new government borrowing would be on track to total four or five times that amount over the same period.

The debt-deficit deal contained virtually no specific cuts to any program. Instead, it would reap $900 billion over 10 years by capping the annual day-to-day operating budgets of Cabinet agencies below inflation.

The deal also set up the bipartisan supercommittee and told it to produce a plan that would cut $1.2 trillion more from future deficits. If the panel failed, as it did, the alternative was automatic spending cuts of a like amount to domestic and military programs.

The budget caps are indeed tough, but they're also easy to support because most of the pain comes in the future. Likewise, the across-the-board cuts, which start in January 2013, won't cause any immediate hardship.

With projected federal spending expected to total about $4 trillion each of the next two years, the August budget pact would cut spending by $25 billion in 2012 and by $115 billion in 2013, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

"They've sketched out the outlines but they haven't painted the picture, and that's the hard part," said Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute and director of the Congressional Budget Office during the deficit battles of the early 1990s. "They have yet to make the tough decisions."

No sooner had the budget deal been adopted than defense hawks such as Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., pledged to block nearly half a trillion dollars in automatic spending cuts for the Pentagon and its military contractors.

"I will not be the Armed Services (Committee) chairman who presides over crippling our military," said Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif.

Congressional champions of defense interests aren't the only lawmakers scampering to protect their favorite programs. The supercommittee's experience exposed the great difficulty of coaxing lawmakers to embrace real spending cuts in other programs.

The chairmen and senior minority members of the Senate and House agriculture committees tried to add a five-year farm bill onto a deficit panel package that never came together. They promised "reforms" that would end much-criticized direct subsidy payments to Southern rice and cotton growers whether they farm or not.

But instead of banking the nearly $50 billion in savings, farm-state lawmakers maneuvered to channel much of the money to a new subsidy for locking in four-decade-high revenues for corn and soybean growers in the Midwest.

The new subsidy would act as a free revenue insurance and could pay out if a farm lost as little as 13 percent of its revenue in a year. They easily could end up costing the government as much or more than the current subsidies to cotton and rice growers

The revenue insurance idea, said Bruce Babcock, an agricultural economist at Iowa State University, is a "cynical attempt to turn deficit reduction into a guarantee of prosperity for large-scale agricultural interests."

Republicans insist that extending the Social Security tax cut and jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed must be paid for through cuts to other programs or finding other nontax sources of money for them.

But using any such arrangements means they're no longer available for cutting deficits.

A list presented Friday to Republicans at a private caucus contained "cuts" that are among the easiest to enact. They include around $15 billion from new auctions of broadcast spectrum to wireless companies, and $35 billion by increasing the fee that mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge lenders to guarantee repayment of new loans. The fee increase would add $15 a month to the monthly cost of an average new mortgage, the White House estimates.

Conspicuously absent are politically nettlesome proposals such as raising airline security fees from the current rate of $2.50 per trip leg, which was part of a recent proposal by supercommittee Republicans.

These spending cuts are measured over 10 years to pay for deficit spending that occurs over the next year or so, which has generated much grumbling among conservatives.

"It's a gimmick," said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz. He complained that the pay-for proposals are spread over a decade while the tax savings to workers and aid for the unemployed are for a single year. He predicted the same dance would occur again year from now when both parties will feel the political pressure to renew them again.

The White House, after saying all fall that Obama's jobs agenda must be paid for with tax increases on high-income earners, appears willing to simply pad the nation's $15 trillion national debt instead of finding offsetting cuts.

"It's not even any more about how you pay for it," said White House press secretary Jay Carney. "It's whether or not one party actually supports giving tax cuts to middle-class Americans."

___

Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/uscongress/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111203/ap_on_go_co/us_deficit_difficulties

breaking dawn part 2 breaking dawn part 2 big game baylor jeremy london jeremy london butterball turkey fryer

Shots fired at Alabama post office, no injuries (Providence Journal)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/168821054?client_source=feed&format=rss

coptic breaking bad season finale breaking bad season finale jets patriots breaking bad breaking bad atlanta falcons

Friday, December 2, 2011

Video: Gingrich slams Obama for early "attack ads" (cbsnews)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/168045459?client_source=feed&format=rss

jim thome jim thome fun fun fun fest fun fun fun fest move your money alabama vs lsu alabama vs lsu

Tom Teicholz: Through a Lens, Starkly: Weegee's Naked Hollywood

2011-11-28-hp_weegeeliz_112511584.jpg
Weegee, "Liz," ca. 1950, International Center of Photography, Bequest of Wilma Wilcox, 1993, ? Weegee/International Center of Photography/Getty Images.

"Pacific Standard Time," the sprawling multivenue consideration of Los Angeles art from 1945 to 1980, is, for the most part, a story of artists who thrived here. However, "Naked Hollywood: Weegee in Los Angeles," which opened Nov. 13 at MOCA Grand Avenue, posits a different narrative, recounting the famed New York photographer's sojourn in Los Angeles between 1947 and 1952 as a somewhat soured love affair. If Hollywood is indeed a boulevard of broken dreams, then the Weegee show is our tour guide.

As, Richard Meyer, an associate professor of art at USC and the exhibition's curator, recalled, MOCA director Jeffrey Deitch's first suggestion to him for the region-wide initiative "Pacific Standard Time: Art in L.A. 1945-1980" was to organize a photo show of "anything but high art" images - street photography, advertising, publicity. Meyer worried that that mandate was impossibly broad, so, instead, remembering that Weegee had produced a book, "Naked Hollywood," he suggested they look at the Weegee archive at New York's International Center for Photography. The book showcases 150 images, but they found more than 1,000 in the archives, some never published. Meyer saw a story in the images, and Deitch quickly agreed to the show.

"Basically, once I said the title, 'Naked Hollywood,' I had him," Meyer said.

Weegee was born Usher Fellig in 1899 in Zloczow, Poland (now known as Zolochiv, Ukraine). When his family arrived at Ellis Island a decade later, his first name was changed to Arthur. As a teenager living on the Lower East Side, he dropped out of school to help support his family. By the 1920s, he was working in a professional darkroom, and, by the mid-1930s, he had become a freelance photographer for a number of tabloid newspapers. In Weegee's telling, his uncanny ability to arrive at crime scenes, sometimes even before the police, led to his nickname "Weegee," a phonetic spelling of Ouija, like the fortune-telling board.

For many years, newspapers like the New York Times rejected Weegee's photographs. However, after The Museum of Modern Art purchased several of his photographs and exhibited them, his reputation grew. In 1945, Weegee published "Naked City," a collection of images that became, Meyer said, "a surprise best-seller." Producer Mark Hellinger purchased the film rights for the then-princely sum of $3,000. In 1947, Weegee arrived in Los Angeles, the self-proclaimed "Genius of the Camera," intending to leave behind tabloid crime scene photography to launch a career as an actor, filmmaker, photo consultant, photographer and celebrity in his own right.

2011-11-28-hp_weegeemarilyn_112511320.jpg

Weegee, "Marilyn Monroe," ca. 1960, International Center of Photography, Bequest of Wilma Wilcox, 1993, ? Weegee/International Center of Photography/Getty Images.

It seems only natural that Weegee, a self-made Jewish immigrant and shameless self-promoter, should expect to find success in the very place Central European immigrants had established what Weegee called "the Dream Factory." A place where landsmen such as Billy Wilder and Michael Curtiz already had made their fortunes. But, as Primo Levi once famously remarked, "Life proved otherwise."

Weegee's arrival in Hollywood, by his own account, was feted by Gene Kelly and acclaimed by Charlie Chaplin. But the first indication that Weegee's ambitions might not be realized came when the movie adaptation of his book appeared, titled "Mark Hellinger's 'Naked City,' " with no marquee or title credit for the photographer. Weegee spent the next four years in Los Angeles photographing premieres, stars and starlets, strippers and showgirls, mannequins and masks, as well as acting in films (he joined the Screen Actors Guild), consulting on movies, making short films and, as always, relentlessly promoting himself. He inserted himself into photos and developed experimental images, shot with distorting plastic lenses and with images repeated or inserted for special effect, to give voice to his increasingly sour view of Hollywood.

In no time, Weegee began referring to Los Angeles as "Newark, New Jersey, with palm trees" and "land of the zombie." It's hard not to see this as a protective film (literally and figuratively) for a man who craved fame and acceptance for the very idiosyncratic style that made him an outsider and his work unique.

Weegee was drawn not just to celebrity, but to the fans, to the candid moments backstage rather than what was on stage, to the sideshow of drunks and skid-row denizens, stars at their least glamorous moments - such as midmeal or resting before a performance. As he once remarked, "I have no inhibitions, and neither has my camera. What may be abnormal to you is normal to me."

It was only upon his return to New York that Weegee, with the help of the writer and designer Mel Harris, culled through his work to produce "Naked Hollywood." The photos are laid out to show contrasts -- a photo of a chimp eating is juxtaposed with one of young Elizabeth Taylor midbite -- and with ironic or witty captions. A photo of a window display featuring "extra-large panties" is titled "Wardrobe dept."

The book, however, did not match the success of "Naked City," and, over time, Weegee's Los Angeles adventure receded behind the legend of his New York work.

Until now.

2011-11-28-hp_weegee_nhcover_112511320.jpg

Cover of "Naked Hollywood."

MOCA's exhibition is organized into nine thematic rooms: "Premiere," "Stars," "Magazines," "Newark With Palm Trees" (including images of shop windows, advertisements and signs), "Showgirls," "Photography Is Elastic" (a showcase of Weegee's distorted portrait images), "Bit Parts" (Weegee's appearances in his own photographs, on sets and on film), "Fraymart Gallery" (a re-creation of a group photography show that included Weegee's work) and "Dream Factory."

Meyer admitted that although he had been aware of Weegee's L.A. work, it was only through exploring these images that he came to see Weegee "as more thoughtful about Hollywood."

Jason Goldman, who assisted Meyer in curating the show, said he was struck by "the extent to which he [Weegee] relied on words." Indeed, Weegee's captions and handwritten annotations render the photographs into ironic social commentary, delivering, as Goldman noted, "a conceptual layer to his work."

Nonetheless, the distortions can seem gimmicky or facile. Weegee's attitude toward women can appear lecherous or outright hostile - his disfigurement of actresses such as Marilyn Monroe or Audrey Hepburn, so beloved for their beauty, seems as much revenge as commentary. There is an ugliness to the work that sometimes seems a badge of honor.

Meyer argues that Weegee forces us to see things and go to places where we may not be comfortable. Or, as Weegee once said, "When you come to a scene you want to photograph, look all around, notice everything." He captured a wider world than most Hollywood lenses. Weegee's Los Angeles is a louche wasteland that allows Weegee to appear a bit swifter, funnier, more cutting than his subjects.

Seeing the works displayed at the museum, one realizes how ahead of his time Weegee was, from his one-name moniker, to his use of multiples and manipulated imagery, to the cultivation of his own persona, and even his own appearances in his work. It comes as no surprise that some of the works on display are on loan from artists operating today in Weegee's shadow, such as Cindy Sherman, Ed Ruscha and Laurie Simmons.

In the gallery guide, Meyer writes: "... Weegee worked at the threshold between creative ambition and commercial enterprise. His incisive eye and conceptual sophistication coexisted with his use of flashy gimmicks, knack for self-promotion, and penchant for off-color humor."

2011-11-28-hp_weegeewardrobedept_112511320.jpg
Weegee, "Wardrobe dept.," ca.1950, International Center of Photography, Bequest of Wilma Wilcox, 1993, ? Weegee/International Center of Photography/Getty Images.

It was as I read these sentences that it struck me that Weegee is, in effect, a stand-in for all the East Coasters over the years who traveled West in search of fame, fortune and the recognition of their talent, confident that New York smarts would best West Coast illusion.

Who among us didn't move to Los Angeles with our own Hollywood dream of conquering the town and threading ourselves into the very fabric of the city? Who among us doesn't have friends who left Los Angeles, as Gladys Knight put it, "on that midnight train to Georgia" - their time in Tinseltown a mirage of unrealized dreams?

How few in the end can say, in Caesar's words: "I came, I saw, I conquered"? Instead, legion are those who faded into the woodwork. Humorist and author S.J. Perelman used to say that all the money one made in Hollywood magically disappeared when you left California. Others, famously, have described their time here as akin to diving into a pool and coming out the other side 20 years later.

Weegee's experience is a cautionary tale, for us as much as it was for him, that asks us to look all around, notice everything and accept a "Naked Hollywood," devoid of the artifice that draws us like moths to a fire.


"Naked Hollywood: Weegee in Los Angeles" continues through Feb. 27 at the Museum of Contemporary Art, 250 S. Grand Ave., downtown. MOCA.org.

This article originally appeared in print in The Jewish Journal of Los Angeles

?

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-teicholz/weegee-naked-hollywood_b_1117430.html

best cyber monday deals cyber monday grover norquist grover norquist nfl week 12 picks nfl week 12 picks jason witten

Anushka, Ranveer pair up again

Well, it seems Anushka Sharma and Ranveer Singh have become the hottest jodi of Bollywood. Filmmakers, one after the other are signing the two in their forthcoming movies. The duo after sharing the screen space with each other in ?Band Baaja Baraat? and ?Ladies vs Ricky Bahl? will be seen together once again in Anurag [...]

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newslatest/~3/XImuv8N6qFU/8820.html

seattle seahawks daniel day lewis bennett bennett patti stanger pasadena pasadena